<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><metadata xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"><dc:title xml:lang="en-EN">sensitivity           #01057</dc:title><dc:identifier>https://digilab.ptb.de/oiml-g-18/vocab/skos/1723</dc:identifier><dc:language>en-EN</dc:language><dc:publisher xml:lang="en-EN">Julia Neumann</dc:publisher><dcterms:created>2022-12-19 09:13:39</dcterms:created><dcterms:modified>2022-12-19 09:58:11</dcterms:modified><dcterms:isPartOf xsi:type="dcterms:URI">https://digilab.ptb.de/oiml-g-18/vocab/</dcterms:isPartOf><dcterms:isPartOf xml:lang="en-EN">OIML G18 Controlled Vocabulary</dcterms:isPartOf><dc:format>text/html</dc:format> <dc:description xml:lang="en-EN"><![CDATA[ Peak area is independent of broadening effects   0 caused by variables such as column temperature, eluent flow rate, and rate of sample injection. From this standpoint, therefore, the peak area is a more satisfactory analytical parameter than peak height. On the other hand, peak heights are more easily measured and, for narrow peaks, more accurately determined. Many modern chromatographic instruments are equipped with electronic integrators that provide precise measurements of relative peak areas. ]]> </dc:description></metadata>